Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rubber Duck
>>BRUCE TONKIN: ...THE OUTCOME OF THE DISCUSSION WE HAD TODAY WAS TRYING TO IDENTIFY A TIME LINE OR A TARGET FOR WHEN IDNS COULD POTENTIALLY BE INTRODUCED. AND THIS TIME LINE NEEDS TO INCORPORATE THE WORK ITEMS OF WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE IETF WITH RESPECT TO UPDATING THE PROTOCOL, WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH RESPECT TO THE TESTS THAT ICANN IS RUNNING, A BOARD DECISION TO ALLOW IDNS FROM A TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVE. THEN WE NEED TO LOOK AT THE ADVICE AND THE TIME LINE OF THAT ADVICE FROM THE GAC, THE CCNSO POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND THE GNSO NEW GTLD POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.
THERE IS A LOT OF INTERCONNECTING EVENTS HERE AND WE FEEL THAT WE NEED TO TAKE A PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH WHERE WE IDENTIFY ALL THESE EVENTS, IDENTIFY THE DEPENDENCIES BUT HAVE A CLEAR TARGET TO TRY TO INTRODUCE THESE IDNS, ASSUMING THAT THE TECHNICAL TESTS ARE SUCCESSFUL...
Looks like a job for Alphamale!
|
They feel they need to take a Project management approach...
errrr, if they havent already been doing that for the last few years, what approach have they been taking? The old i'll engage head in sand and hope the shoe fairies fix it ?