The question is not of if クローム is TM or not. The question is of if the domains were registered in good faith or in bad faith.
In this case, these domains were registered on the day Google released its brower named Chrome. And the registrant has neither Japanese language skills nor legitimate interest in chrome related industries (please correct me if I am wrong).
Given these circumstances, I believe it would be obvious to any panels in arbitration that these domains were registered in bad faith.
|